The Court noted that joint custody is intended to establish a strong personal relationship between children and both parents. It provides parents with the opportunity to remain involved in their children’s lives, and assures children that they are wanted and loved by both parents. If both parents are fit for custody, they should have an equal say in raising their children. In addition to promoting the best interests of the children, joint custody enhances gender equality.
The Court dismissed the petition for sole custody, and maintained the joint custody agreement. The Court noted that Respondent’s application regarding access was only partly granted. While Respondent sought extended access, she was granted access only for (i) every short school holiday, (ii) half of every long school holiday, (iii) daily telephone communications, (iv) one weekend every two months, and (v) every other long weekend.